Posts Tagged ‘Suspense’


Étoile

January 13th, 2012 | article by | 2 Comments »
Tags: , , , ,

dir. Peter Del Monte
1989 / Gruppo Bema / Reteitalia / 101′
written by Peter Del Monte, Franco Ferrini and Sandro Petraglia
cienmatography by Acácio de Almeida
original music by Jürgen Knieper
starring Jennifer Connelly, Gary McCleery, Laurent Terzieff, Charles Durning and Olimpia Carlisi

American ballerina Claire (Jennifer Connelly) travels to Budapest for an audition for either a role in “Swan Lake” or a place in a ballet academy (as about other things, Étoile is decidedly unclear about it, but it really doesn’t matter in the long run). When her time to audition comes, though, Claire has a sudden case of nerves and flees, getting lost in the belly of the theatre the audition takes place in, until she comes to a stage where she, of course, begins to dance.

Claire is witnessed by the ballet troupe’s director (Laurent Terzieff), who for some reason that will become clear later on calls her by the name of Nathalie. Which, of course, again drives Claire to flight.

Later, our heroine, in an understandably bad mood about her own behaviour, tries to distract herself by talking a walk through Budapest. She meets fellow American Jason (Gary McCleery) – with whom she had already met-cute before – and proceeds to do some of that earnest falling in love in minutes young people in movies are so fond of; though it has to be said that Jason seems much more smitten with Claire than she is with him, for Claire has after all already found the love of her life in form of dancing, as she explains to him. Not one to be discouraged by that sort of thing, Jason promises to return to the theatre with Claire the next day to try and get her a second chance for her audition.

That very night, though, Claire is so disturbed by a nightmare about characters from “Swan Lake” the audience also already knows as part of the dance troupe she decides to just pack her things and fly back to the USA at once. Before she can escape whatever she’s fleeing from, though, Claire’s identity (and probably her reality, too) begins to shift. She signs a form with the name “Nathalie Horvath”, and follows a call for a person of that name to the airport’s information booth, from where she is directed to a car waiting for Nathalie/her. Not surprisingly, the car is driven by the dance troupe’s factotum who brings Claire/Nathalie to a rather dilapidated mansion she had already entered once while cavorting with Jason.

From that point on, Claire becomes Nathalie, the prima ballerina of the dance troupe, and spends her time staring at swans in the park, rehearsing for “Swan Lake”, and looking pretty zoned out.

On one of her outings to the park, Nathalie is observed by Jason, who had been pretty frustrated by her supposed return to the USA. When he tries to talk to her, Nathalie doesn’t recognize him. Jason is understandably confused by the whole affair, and begins obsessing about Claire/Nathalie, follows her, sneaks around, succeeds in a Library Use roll, and eventually stumbles on a peculiar and rather horrible truth about his beloved’s coming appearance in “Swan Lake”. If Jason can’t rescue Claire, a past tragedy will repeat itself.

  
  
  

To get the obvious question out of the way first, yes, there are clear parallels between Italian director Peter Del Monte’s Étoile and Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan, but even though both films share certain thematic interests (loss or fluidity of identity of a young woman), and – obviously – “Swan Lake” (a ballet made to explore shifting identities if ever there was one), both directors have very different approaches to their material that can’t all be explained by the different eras their films were made in. Where Aronofsky’s idea of the irrational is grounded in very traditional psychological models (bringing the dreaded bane of “realism” even into a film about somebody losing touch with reality), Del Monte goes a more European way. The Italian is not very interested in realistic psychology, and instead aims for the archetypes found in fairy tales and myths, where symbols and the things symbols are supposed to signify are often one and the same.

It’s difficult to ignore the influence Hitchcock – especially Vertigo - seems to have had on Del Monte’s movie. Watching the film, I was frequently reminded of a less hysterical twin to Brian De Palma’s Hitchcock-influenced (some people would argue ripping off Hitchcock; these people are wrong) phase, an impression that certainly did not decrease through the themes and visual cues these films share. The clear parallels to Hitchcock and De Palma are a bit of a problem for Étoile from time to time, pushing me to comparisons that make it look worse than it deserves. To use an easy example, Gary McCleery sure is no James Stewart (not even a Cliff Robertson).

It would probably have been better to cast the leads five to ten years older, which probably would have made them too old for the fairy tale parallels, but could have improved one of the film’s weak spots to no end. Don’t misunderstand me, McCleery isn’t bad, and young Jennifer Connelly does dreamy, dream-like and beautiful very well indeed, but he is lacking the edge his more obsessive scenes need, and she is not at all convincing in the scenes when she takes on the role of the black swan, both things somewhat more experienced actors could have sold better.

These problems on the acting side aren’t what will make or break Étoile for most viewers though, I think. Basically, the potential audience of Étoile will encounter (or enjoy) the same problems-that-aren’t-actually-problems-but-parts-of-the-general-aesthetic many of my favourite European films of the fantastic show: the languid pacing and ambiguous working of space and time that have more to do with the structure of a dream than that of a textbook narrative; the characters that don’t pretend to function like real people; the emphasis on mood possibly to the detriment of believability and clearly to the detriment of realism. Of course, all these things belong in a movie with no interest in picturing reality, or being “believable” as a depiction of consensus reality.

Generally, Del Monte seems to have control over his film (not something I’d say about all movies in this style) until we come to the climax, that is, when trouble rears its head. Let’s just say that the scene of Jason fighting a giant black swan clearly oversteps the line between the dream-like and symbolic and the painfully ridiculous, and that a dramatic highpoint should probably not be a film’s worst scene.

For most of its running time, though, Étoile plays out like a dream, with all the symbolism and all the ambiguity of symbols that implies. I suspect most of the film’s viewers will either adore – like me – or hate that dream-like mood dominating it; I don’t feel neutrality to be an option.


The Horror!? is a regular cult cinema column by Denis Klotz, aficionado of the obscure and operator of the film blog of the same name.



The Incite Mill

November 4th, 2011 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , ,
Year: 2010  Runtime: 107′  Director: Hideo Nakata
Writer: Satoshi Suzuki   Cinematography: Junichiro Hayashi   Music: Kenji Kawai
Cast: Tatsuya Fujiwara, Haruka Ayase, Satomi Ishihara, Kinya Kitaoji, Nagisa Katahira, Takuro Ohno

Looking at the career of director Hideo Nakata, I can’t avoid the impression he had his difficulties recovering from the catastrophe that was the US The Ring 2, possibly because being responsible for that one is a shame someone with even a little bit of pride in his work would have a hard time living down.

In Nakata’s case, his decline isn’t as horrible as it could be. In fact, compared with Takashi Shimizu, the state of Nakata’s career is absolutely golden, seeing as he’s not making something called Rabbit Horror 3D, and doesn’t seem to have lost all his talent while slumming in Hollywood. The Incite Mill is a clear demonstration that he still has what made me fall in love with his earlier films.

The Incite Mill is a pretty typical entry into the sub-genre of the thriller that is occupied with putting a bunch of characters into an artificially locked down place, having them submit to peculiar and bizarre rules and observing them fastly starting to kill each other off, in part because People Ain’t No Good™, in part because the party responsible for their imprisonment does some subtle and some not so subtle things to, well, incite them to murder. In this variation, the characters have come to the place of their imprisonment out of their own volition, for the promise of a surprising amount of money for just seven days of work in a psychological experiment. Of course, they didn’t expect quite as much violence, nor that they’d be the stars in one of these popular Internet shows nobody in the cast has ever heard of you only encounter in movies.

As this is a Japanese movie, the rules element is quite heavily emphasised, riding one of the hobby horses of Japanese pop culture of the last ten years or so in what is probably a reaction to the country’s still heavily restrictive and regimented society and the resulting pressures to conform on the individual.

  
  
  

There are also many allusions to classic manor mysteries (ten little Indians ahoy), and the Cluedo-inspiring (or Clue-inspiring for you Americans) construction of that very mechanical sub-genre. In a sense, Nakata seems to want to escape the heavy artificiality of his set-up by pointing it out himself. To a degree, this works pretty well, though I couldn’t help but begin to question parts of the story’s basic set-up I would probably not have questioned in a movie less knowingly artificial. Just to take an obvious example: how come the police hasn’t gotten involved if this is not the first time this little show has been broadcast? I can believe in police laziness and incompetence, but I’m pretty sure this sort of thing would at least have been in every news show in the country, and therefore nothing the characters could notknow about. And while I’m thinking about logical problems, how is it that most of the characters actually believe anyone (especially people who never ever show their faces to them) would pay enormous amounts of money for them to take part in a simple psychological experiment? I find this sort of thing much harder to believe than the existence of ghosts, aliens, and vampires, but your mileage may very well vary.

The Incite Mill‘s best moments are interesting enough to let me forget these doubts, however. Besides taking cues from manor mysteries and the brethren in its own sub-genre, the film also does some things that are bound to help a guy like me forget little niggles like logic problems and a lack of coherent worldbuilding. Namely, there is a slight SF element in the form of one of these new-fangled ceiling-bound robots with impressive gripper arms (and some useful gadgets). Even though it isn’t talking or beeping melodically like a good robot should, it’s still there to throw people in jail, inefficiently patrol the Paranoia House’s (yes, that’s how the place of the experiment is named – surely no reason the get paranoid) corridors at night, and to delight my heart to no end. After all, everything is better with robots.

I’d be remiss in my duties if I didn’t mention the good ensemble cast, consisting – among others – of actual movie star Tatsuya Fujiwara (with whom Nakata has worked before on the Death Note spinoff L: Change the World), veteran actor Kinya Kitaoji, veteran TV actress Nagisa Katahira, and some other members of the TV actor and idol business (Haruka Ayase, Satomi Ishihara, Takura Ohno and others). All of them (yes, even the male idols) deliver performances that are generally convincing and often even quite intense. There’s never the feeling that you’re watching idols act. Rather, these are actors who also take part in the idol rat race, but do know about more than pushing their physical assets into the camera. There’s a certain degree of overacting on display, but overacting seems to fit the hysteria-inducing situation the characters are in quite well. Plus, I prefer conscious and artful overacting to the near-catatonic blandness that is so trendy in English language cinema right now. I understand, all that botox makes one’s face difficult to move, but still…

Hideo Nakata for his part has never been a flashy director, usually preferring a style that subtly influences an audience perception of a story and its characters to one that is always pointing at the director’s technical abilities, which usually works to the detriment of the narrative. Nakata is too self-assured a director to have much of a need for showing off. If you want to see his technical accomplishments, you will find them in the careful framing of scenes, in the precise rhythms his films’ editing creates, and in Nakata’s strong sense for iconic imagery that works as an actual, living part of his movies. In The Incite Mill, Nakata shows that all of these talents are still alive and well in him, serving him as well in his new genre of choice as they did when he was making the horror films which made me fall in love with Japanese horror.

The Horror!? is a weekly cult cinema column by Denis Klotz, an aficionado of the obscure and operator of the film blog of the same name.


The Amazing Mr. X

June 10th, 2011 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , ,
a.k.a. The Spiritualist
Year:
1948    Runtime: 78′  Director: Bernard Vorhaus
Writers: Muriel Roy Bolton, Ian McLellan Hunter, Crane Wilbur  Cinematography: John Alton
Music: Alexander Laszlo   Cast: Lynn Bari, Turhan Bey, Cathy O’Donnell, Richard Carlson, Paul Faber, Virginia Gregg

Stinking rich Christine Faber (Lynn Bari) has lost her beloved husband Paul (Donald Curtis) two years ago in the sort of car crash that can only be described with the adjective “fiery”. Though Chris has a new beloved in form of the horrifically boring and prosaic district attorney Martin Abbott (Richard “Wooden” Carlson), and a marriage proposal is in the air, she hasn’t really come to grips with Paul’s death. So it’s not that much of a surprise when Chris one night thinks she hears a voice that might very well be Paul’s – or might just be the sound of the waves hitting the beach close to her villa – calling out her name. On the beach, she doesn’t find Paul’s ghost, but rather a smarmy guy calling himself Alexis (Turhan Bey) who works on her with a highly practiced psychic spiel full of things no stranger could know about the woman.

At first, Chris is still wavering between fascination and scepticism, but a horrible nightmare, or rather a vision full of barely disguised wedding anxiety (which seems perfectly natural when one is to wed Richard Carlson some time in the future), puts Chris over the edge, so she decides to visit Alexis in his “professional” capacity. A few tricks later, Chris is a regular customer of the psychic, a fact neither Martin nor her younger sister Janet (Cathy O’Donnell) are too happy with once they find out.

Continue Reading »



Beyond the Darkness

May 26th, 2011 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , , , ,
a.k.a.: Buio Omega / Blue Holocaust / Buried Alive / In quella casa Buio Omega
Year: 1979   Company: D. R. Communications   Runtime: 94′
Director: Joe D’Amato   Writers: Ottavio Fabbri, Giacomo Guerrini   Cinematography: Joe D’Amato
Music: Goblin   Cast: Kieran Canter, Cinzia Monreale, Franca Stoppi, Sam Modesto, Anna Cardini,
Lucia D’Elia, Mario Pezzin, Walter Tribus, Klaus Rainer, Edmondo Vallini, Simonetta Allodi
Disc company: Media Blasters / Shriek Show   Video: 1080p 1.78:1    Audio: DTS-HD MA 2.0 English
Subtitles: None   Disc: BD50 (Region A)   Release Date: 04/19/2011   Product link: Amazon.com

Media Blasters first announced that it intended to release Joe D’Amato’s magnum opus on Blu-ray more than a year ago, in early spring of 2010.  The news was met with an uneasy mix of joy and trepidation, the former of which slowly whittled away as release date after release date came and went with nary a sign of the disc itself.  The company has blamed the delays on the time it took to get their hands on quality materials for the film, a process that took far longer than anticipated, but whatever the case may be the damage was already done.  Many fans were expecting a mess of epic proportions should the release ever materialize at all.

But materialize it did earlier this month, when retailers and third party sellers were suddenly found to have the title in stock.  Initial press has been far from positive, bemoaning lost footage and audio deficiencies with an unexpected venom, assuring, with anger to spare, that the mess so many expected had at long last arrived.  I have to admit that I completely lost interest in this release as the delays started piling up, but the vitriol with which Beyond the Darkness‘ high definition debut has been received has piqued my curiosity once more.  And so, I put in an order for the title myself, wondering all the while what digital horrors might await me.

Continue Reading »



Deep Red

January 19th, 2011 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Year: 1975   Company: Rizzoli Film, Seda Spettacoli   Runtime: 126′ / 104′
Director: Dario Argento   Writer: Dario Argento and Bernardino Zapponi
Cinematography: Luigi Kuveiller   Music: Goblin, Giorgio Gaslini  Cast: David Hemmings, Daria Nicolodi,
Gabriele Lavia, Macha Meril, Eros Pagni, Giuliana Calandra, Piero Mazzinghi, Glauco Mauri, Clara Calami,
Aldo Bonamano, Liana del Batzo, Vittorio Fanfoni, Dante Fioretti, Geraldine Hooper, Jacopo Mariani
Disc company: Arrow Video   Video: 1080p 2.36:1    Audio: DTS-HD Master 5.1 Italian, Dolby Digital 2.0 Italian,
Dolby Digital 2.0 English (Theatrical cut: Dolby Digital 2.0 English)   Subtitles: English  (Theatrical cut: None)
Discs: BD50 (All Region x1) BD25 (All Region x1)   Release Date: 01/03/2011   Product link: Amazon.co.uk
Deep Red is part of the Arrow Video collection, and is reviewed here from a screener provided by Arrow Films.
Be sure to visit the Cult-Labs forums to have your say on this and future Arrow Video releases.

In the midst of a public demonstration a medium comes into contact with the mind of a murderous maniac.  His identity compromised, the killer stalks the medium back to her apartment and viciously attacks her.  Unfortunately there is a witness – an English jazz pianist named Marcus (Hemmings) who, haunted by memories of something glimpsed in a painting and a cloaked figure in the night, sets out to uncover the killer’s identity.

With newspaper reporter Gianna (Nicolodi) on his side Marcus begins a makeshift investigation, only to discover that the muderer always seems to be a step ahead of him.  As the bodies pile up and Marcus’ own life is put in danger, the musician’s compulsive sleuthing becomes a matter of survival.

Continue Reading »



Whistle and I’ll Come to You

January 14th, 2011 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , ,
Year: 2010   Runtime: 54′   Director: Andy DeEmmony
Writer: Neil Cross   Music: Norwell & Green   Cinematography: Rob Hardy
Cast: John Hurt, Gemma Jones, Lesley Sharp, Sophie Thompson

Retired astronomer James Parkin (John Hurt) has been taking care of his wife Alice (Gemma Jones), who is suffering from some form of senile dementia, for a few years now, but, because of his own age, has to put her into a nursing home.

In an attempt to distract himself from the resulting sadness, and his feeling of having already lost his wife and their love to the ravages of age while they are both still alive, Parkin goes on vacation in an old hotel somewhere on the coast. While going walking along the coastline (or “rambling”, as he prefers to call it), Parkin finds a ring with a Latin inscription translated as “Who is this who is coming?” buried in the sand. He takes the ring with him. From this moment on, Parkin is haunted by something that he might or might not have carried around with himself all along. On the beach, a fearful, shrouded shape that fills Parkin with inexplicable terror is following him; in his hotel, his sleep is disturbed by scratching noises and nightmares that soon enough turn into someone or something banging on his door. As a scientist, Parkin is sceptical of all supernatural explanations, but his fear tells him something different.

Continue Reading »



A Cold Night’s Death

September 18th, 2010 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , ,
company: ABC Circle Films
year: 1973
runtime: 74′
director: Jerrold Freedman
cast: Robert Culp, Eli Wallach,
Michael C. Gwynne
writer: Christopher Knopf
cinematography: Leonard J. South
music: Gil Melle
Not on home video in the USA

Dr. Vogel, at the behest of “the space program” the lone scientist manning a behavioural science station on top of a mountain somewhere in the arctic parts of the US (I suppose), hasn’t been heard from for four weeks. One would think his employers would be a little faster reacting to loss of contact with him, especially when one keeps in mind that his last radio messages were hinting at a psychological breakdown, but I digress. Anyway, said employers haven’t seen the pre-credit sequence that makes it quite clear that something is absolutely not right up there.

Continue Reading »



The Slumber Party Massacre

September 17th, 2010 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , , ,
film rating:
disc rating:
company: New World Pictures
year: 1982
runtime: 77′
director: Amy Holden Jones
cast: Michele Michaels, Robin Stille,
Michael Villella, Debra Deliso,
Andree Honore, Jennifer Meyers,
Joseph Alan Johnson, Brinke Stevens
writer: Rita Mae Brown
cinematography: Stephen Posey
music: Ralph Jones
Reviewed from a screener provided
by Shout! Factory, LLC.
Pre-order this film from Amazon.com

The Slumber Party Massacre Collection double disc DVD set is due out from Shout! Factory on October 5th, in plenty of time for Halloween get togethers, and can currently be pre-ordered through Amazon.com and other online retailers.

The first installment in Roger Corman’s original slasher franchise is a wonderful mostly serious and self-aware addition to a sub-genre saturated with mindless knockoffs of past successes and cheap, irredeemable crap. That’s not to say that The Slumber Party Massacre doesn’t show its roots – quite the contrary, in fact. The basics of the narrative are par for the course, with a group of young women mercilessly stalked by an escaped serial killer while free of parental supervision.

The difference here, as well as with the two sequels, is the director, another in a long line of arguments for producer Corman’s affinity for strong women in film (both before and behind the camera). Indeed, I’m hard pressed to think of any other series of horror films that was helmed exclusively by women. Though far from masterworks on feminism (each takes time out for that all important Corman necessity – gratuitous nudity), the Slumber Party Massacre films do approach the sub-genre from a perspective atypical for the slasher sub-genre.

Continue Reading »



Slumber Party Massacre III

September 17th, 2010 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , ,
film rating:
disc rating:
company: New Concorde
year: 1990
runtime: 87′
director: Sally Mattison
cast: Yan Birch, Brandi Burckett,
Hope Marie Carlton, Keely Christian,
Maria Claire, Alexander Falk
writer: Catherine Cyran
cinematography: Jurgen Baum
music: Jamie Sheriff
Reviewed from a screener provided
by Shout! Factory, LLC.
Pre-order this film from Amazon.com

The Slumber Party Massacre Collection double disc DVD set is due out from Shout! Factory on October 5th, in plenty of time for Halloween get togethers, and can currently be pre-ordered through Amazon.com and other online retailers.

After being pleasantly surprised, thrilled even, with The Slumber Party Massacre and Slumber Party Massacre II, it’s perhaps best to say as little about Slumber Party Massacre III as possible. The period of Corman productions that began with the formation of New Concorde isn’t one I look upon with much fondness, being the time when his method of producing low-budget knock-offs of others’ (not to mention his own) successes was falling flat more and more. I may be a biased supporter of Corman and his place as a visionary independent producer, but even my admiration has its limits.

Continue Reading »



Salvage

June 29th, 2010 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , , , ,
film rating:
disc rating:
companies: Hoax Films,
The UK Film Council, BBC Films, Northwest
Vision and Media, Digital Departures,
The Liverpool Culture Company
year: 2009
runtime: 75′
director: Lawrence Gough
cast: Neve McIntosh, Shaun Dooley,
Linzey Cocker, Dean Andrews,
Shahid Ahmed, Trevor Hancock
writers: Lawrence Gough,
Colin O’Donnell and Alan Pattinson
cinematography: Simon Tindall
music: Stephen Hilton
Reviewed from a screener provided
by Revolver Entertainment
Order this film from Amazon.com

Salvage is due for release on DVD from Revolver Entertainment on July 6th, and is currently available for pre-order through Amazon.com and other online retailers.

Over the past decade the British Isles have become ground zero for modern low budget horror.  Motivated by the success of Danny Boyle’s comparatively lavish 28 Days Later (produced for around $10 million) aspiring filmmakers looking to cut their teeth on the genre have been pouring from the woodwork as of late.  2009’s Salvage follows in the frugal footsteps of The Dead Outside and Colin, and makes for a promising if imperfect feature film debut for writer and director Lawrence Gough.

Salvage begins quietly enough, with teenager Jodie (Linzey Cocker, Is Anybody There?) traveling to a quiet suburban cul-de-sac to spend Christmas with her divorced mother Beth (Neve McIntosh, Bodies).  None too pleased with the prospect of spending the holiday with her mother to begin with, things become more complicated when Jodie happens upon the woman in the midst of a casual sexual encounter with Kieran (Shaun Dooley, the Red Riding trilogy).  Understandably perturbed by the sight of her mother bonking about with an unknown gent (and on Christmas Eve, no less!), Jodie storms out of her mother’s house and across the street to spend the rest of the holiday with one of her childhood friends.
Continue Reading »



The Human Centipede (First Sequence)

May 5th, 2010 | article by | 5 Comments »
Tags: , , , , , , ,
rating:
company:
Six Entertainment
year: 2009
runtime: 90′
director: Tom Six
cast: Dieter Laser, Arthur C. Williams,
Ashlynn Yennie, Akihiro Kitamura,
Andreas Leupold, Peter Blankenstein
writer: Tom Six
cinematography: Goof de Koning
music: Patrick Savage
and Holeg Spies
out in limited release and
on demand from IFC Films

It’s safe to say that expectations for The Human Centipede (First Sequence), Dutch director Tom Six’s foray into gross-out surgical horror, have been set unreasonably high in advance of its US theatrical and On Demand release through IFC Films.  Its twisted premise has been described as disturbing, disgusting, controversial and just plain creepy, and understandably so.  I mean, who wouldn’t be grossed out by the sight of a trio of helpless people connected, end to end, to create one long ass-to-mouth digestive tract?  Well, me I guess.

That The Human Centipede has won numerous genre festival awards and received no end of accolades in the horror press is of little consequence, as once one pierces through the layers of obfuscating hype to see the film itself the sad truth of it becomes obvious.  This movie sucks ass.

Continue Reading »



The Hereafter

January 22nd, 2010 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , ,

company: “Des Dolan presents”
year: 1983
runtime: 84′
country: United Kingdom
director: Michael J. Murphy
cast: Steven Longhurst, Catherine Rowlands,
David Slater, Wendy Young
writer: Michael J. Murphy
cinematographer: David Daynes
music: Philip Love, Terry Mills
not on home video

Neville Harmer (Steven Longhurst) has lived most of his life dominated by his rich, wheelchair-bound father, in whose old country mansion he still lives as a grown up. Lately, Neville has found someone else to tell him what to do, though. I suppose his girlfriend Vicky’s (Catherine Rowlands) way to manipulate him is rather more pleasant. Still, having the bedroom of a grumpy old guy right next door to your own can put a strain on any relationship.

One day, Neville’s father dies in a freak wheelchair accident, leaving Neville with quite an inheritance. Unfortunately, his dad’s will contains a clause that forbids his son to sell the dreary old mansion and demands of him to keep living there. The family business has been conducted out of the house anyway.

Living alone in the house with Vicky, with their only regular human contact being the manly-man groundskeeper Patrick (David Slater) and Neville’s secretary Dorothy (Wendy Young), seems to put Neville under quite some psychic strain. He is convinced that the house is haunted, and what do you know? Soon after he has told Vicky about his ideas he begins to see a strange, papermache-masked figure creeping around. The seance Vicky arranges “just for fun” doesn’t exactly soothe his mind either.

The strange happenings are of course all part of a mildly fiendish plot Vicky and Patrick have concocted to make Neville look disturbed enough to commit suicide. All seems to be going well with their plan, until a masked Patrick throws Neville out of a window without managing to kill his boss.


Their victim still doesn’t realize what’s really going on, though, so there’s always a chance for a second try. It should be easier to murder Neville now anyway, seeing that his fall left him as paralyzed and wheelchair-bound as his father before him.

With this thought (and sex) on their mind, the would-be murderers are getting careless, and it does not take long until Neville finally understands what is really going on around him. This realization – and the possibly not unfounded idea that his ancestral home itself is trying to protect him – suddenly lets the up to now passive man grow a spine. Neville develops his own plan for a little revenge.

Finding any information about The Hereafter‘s director Michael J. Murphy (here working under the pseudonym of Michael Mersack) or his films online isn’t exactly easy. The IMDB for example only lists two of his 25 movies, this one not among them. Fortunately there is at least this interview to be found, which makes Murphy sound like a British version of some of the budget-less yet driven filmmakers who are responsible for some of the most interesting genre films you’ll be able to see. People like him and Norman J. Warren make me wish for a UK-oriented version of Stephen Thrower’s wonderful book Nightmare USA. In Murphy’s case, I’d even be satisfied with the simple availability of more of his movies.

The Hereafter itself isn’t exactly a masterpiece, not even of the highly skewed and strange variation I usually get excited about. It is not weird enough of a film to be fascinating, and a little too dull to fully function as the thriller with slight supernatural undertones it is supposed to be. That does not mean The Hereafter is bad, rather, the whole film seems to be out to prove to later generations of backyard and low budget filmmakers that having no money need not be an excuse for having no ambition of making an actual movie instead of a shoddy succession of scenes you call a movie, but fails at the final hurdle of working as well as it would like to.


At the least this one has a real script, with not original yet at least consistent characters, and tries its hardest to make an unexciting premise into an exciting film by sheer force of will of its director.

Murphy didn’t have money, but he had a creepy looking house, a lake, and woods, and he obviously tried his hardest to put them to as much and as good use to build a mood as possible.

You can really see the director straining in every shot to do something at least a little interesting, be it through the use of unconventional angles, more thoughtful than one can expect editing or some very cool use of handheld shots. Sometimes – to be honest a little too often – the film is only straining for that point where “interesting” becomes something more, but in its best moments like the scene of Neville using all his not exactly inexhaustible strength (very much reminding me of the movie itself in this point) to crawl up a flight of stairs, it actually finds it and becomes the sort of stubbornly individualistic film I’m looking for in my no-budget movies.

That stairs scenes is also one of the fine moments of Steven Longhurst in a film not exactly dominated by strong acting. I wouldn’t call the film’s acting bad, it just tends to be (perhaps in conscious avoidance of soap operatic scenery-chewing) a bit too disaffected for its own good. It’s a bit of a shame when you look at the handful of scenes where Longhurst and Rowlands are allowed to show a bit more emotion. The unemotional effect is amplified by the fact that much if not all of the dialogue seems to have been dubbed in after the film was shot and everyone’s line readings sound very much like readings.

However, what differentiates The Hereafter enough from many other ultra low budgets films that only sometimes achieve their artistic goals to make me pine for seeing more of Murphy’s films is the raw talent underlying it all. It seems obvious to me that Murphy had the ability and the creativity to make a film that’s special. If he has ever managed to actually make one is something I’d just love to find out.


For more bizarre movie goodness, be sure
to visit Denis’ excellent review blog The Horror!?



Carriers – DVD

January 6th, 2010 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

postercompany: Paramount Vantage
year: 2009
runtime: 84′
country: United States
directors: Alex and David Pastor
cast: Lou Taylor Pucci, Chris Pine,
Piper Parabo, Emily VanCamp
writers: Alex and David Pastor
cinematographer: Benoit Debie
music: Peter Nashel
dvd company: Paramount Home Video
release date: December 29, 2009
retail price: $19.99
disc details: Region 1 / NTSC / single layer

video: progressive / 2.35:1 anamorphic
audio:
Dolby Digital (5.1 English, 2.0 Spanish)
subtitles:
English, Spanish, French
order this film from Amazon.com

Plot: The world is devastated by an unstoppable plague that leaves everyone who contracts it dead in its wake.  Four young people travel the backroads of the southwest, headed for the safety of an isolated beach motel on the Gulf Coast while following a five-step plan to avoid infection.

Early advertising for Carriers, which received a disparagingly limited theatrical release and is now making its debut on home video, passed it off as a topical shocker about a lethal outbreak of the avian flu while the latest trailer makes it appear to be just another zombie-pocalypse. “The only thing more dangerous than the disease . . . are the carriers,” it says before a seemingly dead man’s eyes burst open.  It’s a pity that Paramount Vantage couldn’t think of a more effective (and honest) manner of advertising the film, as Carriers has nothing to do with either the avian flu or roving hordes of the undead.

The truth of the matter is this:  Carriers is quite simply one of the best films about the death of man ever produced – a stripped down and intelligent character driven apocalypse picture that creates a palpable sense of existential dread without resorting to gross-out violence or cheap thrills.

001 002
003 004

The Pastor brothers, a duo of Spanish film-makers who pull double duty here as both writers and directors, play their story as a thematic homage to classic end-of-the-world vehicles of the past and wisely avoid the contrivances of the action-packed and empty headed post-Mad Max thrill fests that now dominate the genre.  The focus of Carriers is squarely on its main characters, all of whom the Pastor brothers lend considerable depth and none of whom fall into the expected teenaged monster-bait stereotype.

Carriers eschews back story about the plague itself, leaving its menace enigmatic and negating the need for any kind of bloated scientific discourse on the subject.  What is shown of its aftermath is enough to convince of its destructive potential – emptied city streets, abandoned CDC encampments, and waste disposal trucks piled high with body bags.  As dangerous as the plague itself are those it has left behind and clinging to survival, as evidenced by the sight of a murdered man crucified on a farmhouse windmill with a sign – “chinks brought it” – draped across his chest.

In-fighting among clusters of humanity has provided the primary dramatic momentum for apocalypse films since Arch Obeler’s Five from 1951, with man’s inability to deal with himself often proving far more deadly than the overriding threat of radiation sickness, flesh-eating zombies, etc.  Carriers takes the opportunity to turn that convention on its head in one scene, in which disagreement among a band of plastic-wrapped gun-toting survivalists allows for the escape of our main cast.  Such quarreling will surely mean the end of that group, but our heroes will live to drive another day.

005 006
007 008

The tension among our protagonists results from their own humanity.  Allowing a father (Christopher Meloni in a big supporting role) and his infected daughter to travel with them in the plastic and duct-tape sealed back of an SUV invites the virus into the presumed safety of their group.  It predictably spreads, giving the uninfected no choice but to make necessary (but no less horrific for their necessity) decisions – to leave sick friends to die on the side of the road, and worse.  When the final survivors reach their final destination they are despondent, their humanity crushed by what came before, and hardly in a position to rebuild the foundations of civilization.  They wander the ruins, remembering what was while coming to terms with what is – waiting for the ever-dimmer flame of mankind to snuff itself out.

The Pastor brothers, in an interview with Twitchfilm, have provided some insight into their inspirations here – John Wyndham’s superior disaster novel The Day of the Triffids and Geoff Murphy’s inconsistent but undeniably haunting The Quiet Earth.  Their film happily reminds of the best moments from scores of its apocalyptic predecessors (The Last Man on Earth, The World The Flesh and The Devil, Dawn of the Dead and more) while managing to far surpass many of them in its overall effectiveness.  To take a premise that’s been part of cinema DNA for the better part of the past 80 years and mold such a fresh, effective dramatic thriller from it is no small task, but the Pastor brothers have done so with style to spare.  Keep an eye on these guys – if there’s any fairness in the world then they’re going places.

I don’t know quite what I was expecting from Paramount’s DVD issue of Carriers (no Blu-ray is scheduled at present), though after their cut-rate theatrical release it couldn’t have been much.  They’re single layer disc certainly meets those minimal expectations, but its a far cry from the appreciative home video release we might have hoped for.

009 010
011 012

Carriers is presented in the original scope 2.35:1 theatrical aspect ratio in a good 16:9 enhanceed and progressive transfer.  Detail is relatively strong and the colors and contrast are very representative of how the film looked when it played theatrically.  There’s a hint of edge enhancement throughout, but otherwise I have no complaints.  The single layer encode is likewise solid, 4 gigs being more than enough for the short (84′) film.  The primary audio option is a Dolby Digital 5.1 surround English track, which does a fine job capturing the subtle sound design.  A Dolby Digital 2.0 stereo Spanish dub is also included, as are subtitles in English, Spanish, and French.

And that, I’m sad to say, is it.  No commentary track, no interviews, not even an original theatrical trailer.  The only supplements are a handful of previews for other Paramount titles – Wrong Turn at Tahoe, G. I. Joe, and the reboot of Star Trek – and a short spot against tobacco products featuring a baby in an SUV being molested by bubbles floating in from around the world.  None of it has anything to do with Carriers, aside from the cross-promotion of lead Chris Pine’s turn as Captain Kirk in Star Trek.  At least the movie looks and sounds good.

The Pastor brothers have crafted something special here, and it definitely deserves to be seen.  Paramount Home Video’s DVD release leaves a bad taste in this reviewer’s mouth, but those who have been waiting patiently to get a crack at the film (and there are many) now have the opportunity to do so.  The $19.99 price tag is steep but expected, and Amazon is already selling the title at 25% below retail.  The DVD gets my begrudging recommendation, given that it’s the only way to see the film at present – Carriers itself is a must-see.

013



The Box

November 12th, 2009 | article by | No Comments »
Tags: , , , , , , ,

postercompany: Warner Bros. Pictures
year: 2009
runtime: 116′
country: United States
director: Richard Kelly
cast: Cameron Diaz, James Marsden,
Frank Langella, James Rebhorn,
Holmes Osborne, Sam Oz Stone
out in wide release

Warning: Spoilers may lie ahead

I don’t believe I have ever seen a movie that confused me so much. I will not even attempt a complete plot summary as its disparate elements are so far flung and baffling that it would be a difficult task to condense them all into a review. The Box disappointed me because I was optimistic about seeing this movie after reading reviews and because the premise seemed to have a lot of potential. A couple is offered a choice: push a button and win one million dollars however pressing the button will cause the death of an unknown person. Based upon the story Button, Button by Richard Matheson, the premise conjured questions of morality: upon what do we base our morality, and are we capable of ever truly being moral entities?

The beginning of the movie seemed to deliver on that promise. A couple, Norma (Cameron Diaz) and Arthur (James Marsden), receives a box early one morning which contains a button mounted on a wooden base and covered in a glass dome. Later that day a man calling himself Mr. Steward arrives at their house and explains the conditions of the million dollar prize. They may not speak to anyone about the offer that has been made to them or they forfeit the million dollars, and Steward is not able to answer any questions about those who employ him. They also have only 24 hours to make their decision. This offer is immediately tempting because of the financial difficulties faced by the couple. After almost a full day of discussion, Norma pushes the button 15 minutes before Mr. Steward arrives to reclaim and reprogram the box.

From this point on the film diverges wildly from the Matheson story. What had begun as an interesting examination of the moral choices that human beings make, becomes a paranoid rambling that centers around a partnership between the United States government and Mr. Steward with Norma and Arthur at its center trying to desperately save themselves. It appears that for some reason Norma and Arthur should be somehow punished for choosing to push the button. The parallels between this couple and Adam and Eve are quite apparent throughout the film, and are highlighted by the existence of two other couples that are briefly present in the film. In all three cases the wife pushes the button while her husband sits next to her silently. One could be forgiven for assuming there is a misogynist bent to the film.

As for Mr. Steward, it appears that he was actually killed during a lightning storm while testing equipment for NASA. This has happened sometime before the events shown in the film take place. Sometime after being sent to the morgue, he is miraculously resuscitated and it is implied his body is being inhabited by another being. This new being, which has adopted Steward’s name and form, is conducting an experiment on behalf of a group which he refers to as “those whom control the lightning.” If a magical number of people choose to press the button and receive the million dollars these mysterious lightning people will decide to speed up the extinction of the human race. The assumption is that only moral species are allowed to survive, though no one seems to be offering this choice to lions, or dolphins, or spiders or any other animal that kills others of its species for personal gain (food, mates, space, etc). It is also never quite made clear what moral code this decision will be based on which in turn makes the movie somewhat hard to interpret.

With the powers granted to him by the lightning people, Steward mobilizes a large group of people he refers to as his employees. They distinguish themselves from the rest of the cast by doing things in unison, having nose bleeds, and walking around with their mouths open as if to catch insects. Their purpose in the film is never really made clear. Are they spying on the couple? Are they doing Steward’s laundry? We are never really told. A few of them do useful things like drive Steward’s car, deliver notes, or kidnap children but they are a fraction of the number that are actually “employed.” They seem to exist solely to create an atmosphere of paranoia a la INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS.

The ending of the film is the most bewildering part. Norma and Arthur’s son Walter is kidnapped, and through some ambiguous, though reversible, process he is rendered both deaf and blind. He is then deposited in the couple’s bathroom while his parent’s face their final choice. Because Norma pushed the button, they can either keep the million dollars and live with a blind and deaf son, or Arthur can shoot Norma in the heart at point blank range and their son can regain his sight and hearing. Either way Walter, who has had absolutely no active role in any of the decisions that his parents have made, suffers. Either he loses both of his parents or he exists in a world of silent darkness forever. Arthur and Norma decide that their son’s welfare is the most important thing, and Norma insists that Arthur shoot her. At the moment that Arthur pulls the trigger, another couple is deciding to push the reprogrammed button given to them by Mr. Steward. I can only assume that her decision to sacrifice herself is a way to atone for her more selfish decision to accept the million dollars.

At this point, then, it becomes unclear who actually is responsible for Norma’s death. Is it her husband or is it the new couple who pressed the button? This has huge implications for the rest of the film. One presumes that because Norma pressed the button and she is guilty of someone’s death that for justice to be served she has to die. However, as we learn during the film, the woman that was killed when Norma pushed her button was shot at point blank range by her husband. Who, then, is responsible for the woman’s death – Norma, or the husband who ultimately pulled the trigger? After seeing the ending, the rest of the movie seemed to fall apart. None of the obscure Sartre references help much either.

Lastly, for powerful supernatural beings, these lightning folks don’t seem to know much about experimental protocol. They could have learned plenty about human morality by simply observing us, and it would have saved them a lot of effort and money in making little wooden boxes to send out to unsuspecting people and in kidnapping and brainwashing dozens of people. In addition the lightning beings will only choose couples who are married and have one child. So as a result of the actions of this specific group of people, the rest of us will be either doomed or saved.

Aside from the gaping plot holes the movie makes the mistake of being much too broad. It attempts to integrate too many plot devices and twists and eventually loses the elegance and simplicity of the original premise. This has the additional consequence of making the message of the film rather obscure. Is the ultimate lesson that it’s bad to kill people even if you don’t know them? There are children’s books that make the point more succinctly. Instead of interrogating the motives for making a selfish versus selfless choice, it explodes into conspiratorial silliness. If the premise interests you do yourself a favor and simply read the Matheson story. As is the case with I Am Legend, the textual version of the story offers so much more than the version adapted for the screen.



Carriers

September 11th, 2009 | article by | 7 Comments »
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

company: Paramount Vantage
year: 2009
runtime: 84′
country: United States
directors: Alex and David Pastor
cast: Lou Taylor Pucci, Chris Pine,
Piper Parabo, Emily VanCamp
writers: Alex and David Pastor
cinematographer: Benoit Debie
Visit the awful official movie site
Out in limited release in the USA

The world is devastated by an unstoppable plague that leaves everyone who contracts it dead in its wake.  Four young people travel the backroads of the southwest, headed for the safety of an isolated beach motel on the Gulf Coast while following a five-step plan to avoid infection.

Early advertising for CARRIERS, currently in a disparagingly limited release, passed it off as a topical shocker about a lethal outbreak of the avian flu while the latest trailer makes it appear to be just another zombie-pocalypse. “The only thing more dangerous than the disease . . . are the carriers,” it says before a seemingly dead man’s eyes burst open.  It’s a pity that Paramount Vantage couldn’t think of a more effective [and honest] manner of advertising the film, as CARRIERS has nothing to do with either the avian flu or roving hordes of the undead.

The truth of the matter, and the reason I find its manner of release so appalling, is this:  CARRIERS is quite simply one of the best films about the death of man ever produced – a stripped down and intelligent character driven apocalypse picture that creates a palpable sense of existential dread without resorting to gross-out violence or cheap thrills.

carriers_ver2The Pastor brothers, a duo of Spanish film-makers who pull double duty here as both writers and directors, play their story as a thematic homage to classic end-of-the-world vehicles of the past and wisely avoid the contrivances of the action-packed and empty headed post-MAD MAX thrill fests that now dominate the genre.  The focus of CARRIERS is purely on its main characters, all of whom the Pastor brothers take the time to lend considerable depth and none of whom fall into the teenaged monster-bait stereotype.

CARRIERS eschews backstory about the plague itself, leaving its menace enigmatic and negating the need for any kind of bloated scientific discourse on the subject.  What is shown of its aftermath is enough to convince of its destructive potential – emptied city streets, abandoned CDC encampments, and waste disposal trucks piled high with body bags.  As dangerous as the plague itself are those who are clinging to survival, as evidenced by the sight of a murdered man crucified on a farmhouse windmill with a sign reading “Chincs brought it” draped across his chest.

In-fighting among clusters of humanity has provided the primary dramatic momentum for apocalypse films since Arch Obelers FIVE from 1951, with man’s inability to deal with himself often proving far more deadly than the overriding threat of radiation sickness, flesh-eating zombies, etc.  CARRIERS takes the opportunity to turn that convention on its head in one scene, in which disagreement among a band of plastic-wrapped gun-toting survivalists allows for the escape of our main cast.  Such quarrelling will surely mean the end of that group, but our heroes will live to drive another day.

carriers_3The tension among our protagonists results from their own humanity.  Allowing a father [Christopher Meloni in a big supporting role] and his infected daughter to travel with them in the plastic and duct-tape sealed back of an SUV invites the virus into the presumed safety of their group.  It predictably spreads, giving the uninfected no choice but to make necessary [but no less horrific for their necessity] decisions – to leave sick friends to die on the side of the road, and worse.  When the final survivors reach the beach they are despondent, their humanity crushed by what came before, and hardly in a position to rebuild the foundations of civilization.  They wander the ruins, remembering what was while coming to terms with what is – waiting for the ever-dimmer flame of mankind to snuff itself out.

The Pastor brothers, in an interview with Twitchfilm, provided some insight into their inspirations here – John Wyndham’s superior disaster novel THE DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS and Geoff Murphy’s inconsistent but undeniably haunting THE QUIET EARTH.  Their film happily reminds of the best moments from scores of its apocalyptic predecessors [THE LAST MAN ON EARTH, THE WORLD THE FLESH AND THE DEVIL, DAWN OF THE DEAD and more] while managing to far surpass many of them in its overall effectiveness.  To take a premise that’s been part of cinema DNA for the better part of the past 80 years and mold such a fresh, effective dramatic thriller from it is no small task, but the Pastor brothers have done so with style to spare.  Keep an eye on these guys – if there’s any fairness in the world then they’re going places.

Whether or not mainstream audiences will be willing to embrace a quiet and deliciously restrained end of the world effort with under-acheiving big-budget trash like 2012 on its way is something we may never know, as Paramount has all but doomed the film’s theatrical life through its underfunded and blatantly fallacious advertising campaign.  I expect that most of you reading this will have to wait until CARRIERS makes its way to home video to see it at all.  My advice is to check your local theater listings and make a point to catch it that way, if possible [it's playing matinees at Block E Kerasotes here in Minneapolis through next Thursday].  The Pastor brothers have crafted something special here, and it deserves to be seen.