<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earth vs. The Flying Saucers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wtf-film.com/site/2010/02/09/earth-vs-the-flying-saucers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wtf-film.com/site/2010/02/09/earth-vs-the-flying-saucers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=earth-vs-the-flying-saucers</link>
	<description>Celebrating the good, the bad, and the bizarre since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Pyrtle</title>
		<link>http://wtf-film.com/site/2010/02/09/earth-vs-the-flying-saucers/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Pyrtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wtf-film.com/site/?p=4002#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>I think you hit the nail on the head about the colorization. The obviousness of the &quot;now in COLOR&quot; splash on the covers for all these new special editions tells me that it&#039;s more about marketing than anything else, no matter how often everyone involved with the discs reiterates that Harryhausen and Schneer would have filmed them in color if it weren&#039;t for those pesky low budgets.  

Still, I can&#039;t be too perturbed about it.  The black and white originals look exceptional on these discs, and as long as the colorized variants don&#039;t usurp them in future editions I&#039;m happy, more or less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you hit the nail on the head about the colorization. The obviousness of the &#8220;now in COLOR&#8221; splash on the covers for all these new special editions tells me that it&#8217;s more about marketing than anything else, no matter how often everyone involved with the discs reiterates that Harryhausen and Schneer would have filmed them in color if it weren&#8217;t for those pesky low budgets.  </p>
<p>Still, I can&#8217;t be too perturbed about it.  The black and white originals look exceptional on these discs, and as long as the colorized variants don&#8217;t usurp them in future editions I&#8217;m happy, more or less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: houseinrlyeh</title>
		<link>http://wtf-film.com/site/2010/02/09/earth-vs-the-flying-saucers/comment-page-1/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>houseinrlyeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wtf-film.com/site/?p=4002#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>The &quot;putting the romance out of the way&quot; part is one of the things I always enjoyed about this one. I find the romance elements in 50s SF/Horror usually creepier than any monster could ever be, and not having to watch two pieces of wood &quot;fall in love&quot; is a real plus in my book.

I just don&#039;t get colorization. For whom is it supposed to be? Those people who would never watch a black and white film?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;putting the romance out of the way&#8221; part is one of the things I always enjoyed about this one. I find the romance elements in 50s SF/Horror usually creepier than any monster could ever be, and not having to watch two pieces of wood &#8220;fall in love&#8221; is a real plus in my book.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t get colorization. For whom is it supposed to be? Those people who would never watch a black and white film?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

